[76]
On this,
great scruples arose in men's minds, and some doubt as to what had really been done. Then some
of the judges, wise men, trained in the old-fashioned principles of the ancient tribunals, as
they could: not acquit a most guilty man, and yet, as they did not like at once to condemn a
man, in whose case there appeared reason to suspect that bribery had been employed against
him, before they were able to ascertain the truth of this suspicion, gave as their decision,
“Not proven.” But some severe men, who made up their minds that regard
ought to be had to the intention with which a thing was done by any one, although they
believed that others had only given a correct decision through the influence of bribery,
nevertheless thought that it behoved them to decide consistently with their previous
decisions. Accordingly, they condemned him. There were five in all, who, whether they did so
out of ignorance, or out of pity, or from being influenced by some secret suspicion, or by
some latent ambition, acquitted that innocent Oppianicus of yours altogether.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.